Hurtin' USA
Single released on 20 May 2022
(For more information on this substack and the band - Not Fit For Purpose - the What/Why/Who/When/Where/How - check out my about page. To listen to the track on Bandcamp, click on the album artwork.)
I wrote this song after seeing some headlines about a paper written by the CDC COVID-19 Response Team. Their “interpretation” of safety data was that “most reported adverse events were mild and short in duration”. This message was amplified, if not trumpeted, by the MSM around the world.
We’ll take a tour through the lyrics and highlight articles where you can find pertinent information.
Mommy, Daddy, what's gonna happen to me?
What's gonna happen to me?
This is such an important question - the long term studies about the impact of these vaccines have not been done. Indeed, the original clinical trials have been unblinded so long term studies about safety CANNOT be done. The answer is: no-one knows what’s going to happen to you - you’re on your own.
Covid-19: Should vaccine trials be unblinded?
Consumer representative Sheldon Toubman, a lawyer and FDA advisory panel member, said that Pfizer and BioNTech had not proved that their vaccine prevents severe covid-19. “The FDA says all we can do is suggest protection from severe covid disease; we need to know that it does that,” he said.
He countered claims, based on experience with other vaccines, six weeks of follow-up was long enough to detect safety signals. Six weeks may not be long enough for this entirely new type of “untested” [mRNA] vaccine, Toubman said.
Goodman wants all companies to be held to the same standard and says they should not be allowed to make up their own rules about unblinding. He told The BMJ that, while he was “very optimistic” about the vaccines, “blowing up the trials” by allowing unblinding “will set a de facto standard for all vaccine trials to come.” And that, he said, “is dangerous.”
December 2020
If everybody had a vaccine across the USA,
then everybody'd be computin' messenger RNA.
You'll need to upgrade each season to combat variants they say.
New human operating system with messenger RNA.
mRNA Platform: Enabling Drug Discovery & Development
‘Recognizing the broad potential of mRNA science, we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer. It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the "program” or “app” is our mRNA drug - the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.’
from Moderna website
I’m citing the following article in CNN, not because you should fall for the fear messaging, but simply to show that we are being encouraged to “upgrade” each season because “scientists say so”.
Updated Covid-19 boosters are expected in September. Will it be too late?
Once boosters are updated for the fall, the FDA said, people who get boosted now "may consider getting one." Scientists say it will be important to get this updated version.
August 2022
They say it stays in your shoulder, they know that it’s not true.
Their bio-distribution studies gave them a massive clue:
Spike protein gets in the bloodstream, every major organ too,
Crossing the blood brain barrier, blood clots and strokes for you.
The Pfizer document pertaining to bio-distribution and accumulation of lipids
Jessica Rose analyses the Pfizer document, and suggests that the following would have been a more truthful and balanced conclusion to the bio-distribution study:
Although greatest mean tissue concentration remained at the injection site, biodistribution was clearly demonstrated and lipids were found in high concentrations in the liver, spleen, adrenals and ovaries following a short time period of 48 hours. Whether or not the accumulation continued following this time period is unknown. More research is required before trials on humans are initiated.
March 2022
And Steve Kirsch highlights some:
Excellent SHORT educational videos on the COVID shots
PEG is required to get the mRNA into the cell. But the problem is that it gets it into cells everywhere in your body, including inside your brain (it allows the vaccine to penetrate the blood-brain barrier).
July 2022
Software of life - their analogy -
What about programming errors, hurtin' you and me?
Plug and play with your RNA,
Do they know what it does to your DNA?
Back to the Moderna website now:
mRNA Platform: Enabling Drug Discovery & Development
Our mRNA Medicines – The ‘Software of Life’
It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the "program” or “app” is our mRNA drug - the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.
But there's no need for the jab, no need for EUA,
When alternative products are treating covid today.
They won't approve Ivermectin 'cause it's as cheap as chips,
and the vaccine alliance won't renew their sponsorships.
The FDA explain EUA, and when it’s needed, on their website
Emergency Use Authorization for Vaccines Explained
Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.
So, what about Ivermectin? Here’s a:
Joint Statement on Widespread Use of Ivermectin in India for Prevention and Early Treatment
E-BMC Ltd presented the evidence on Ivermectin to prevent and treat covid-19 to the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BiRD) panel in February 2021. The BiRD group includes researchers and doctors from around the world who have been seeking effective treatments to combat the pandemic. The BiRD panel deliberated on the evidence for the use of Ivermectin against covid-19 resulting in a recommendation in favour Ivermectin as a covid-19 frontline therapy.
Stories of Ivermectin’s ability to beat covid-19 can be found in many parts of the world, including the Dominican Republic, Peru, Zimbabwe and South Africa, as well as in other African countries where mass administration of ivermectin against parasitic infections is practiced. More than 3.7 billion people have been treated with Ivermectin for parasitic infections and it has been found to be extremely safe.
It works! So there’s no need for an EUA for a COVID “vaccine”.
Is there a conflict of interest within the CDC?
Their observational study: “side effects of the vaccine”
shows one in twelve of those reported classified as severe,
one in twelve severely hurting, hurtin' USA:
prolonged hospitalisation, hurtin' USA;
disability that's permanent, hurtin' USA;
life threatening illnesses, hurtin' USA;
congenital birth defects, hurtin' USA;
one in seventy reports are deaths, hurtin' USA.
Is that a safe effective vaccine, hurtin' USA?
Is that professional negligence by the CDC?
Regulatory capture of the FDA?
Just follow the money hurtin' USA.
So, now we get to the paper written by the CDC COVID-19 Response Team:
Here’s a snippet from the paper’s findings:
VAERS processed 340 522 reports: 313 499 (92·1%) were non-serious, 22 527 (6·6%) were serious (non-death), and 4496 (1·3%) were deaths.
So, we have 22527 + 4496 = 27023 reports that are severe (i.e. serious, or death), out of 340522. That’s about 1 in 12. And the death rate is 4496 out of 340522 - near enough 1 in 70.
To clarify, the FDA’s definition of serious adverse events has the following in its list of outcomes needing to be reported:
death
life-threatening
hospitalization (initial or prolonged)
disability or permanent damage
congenital anomaly / birth defect
Their “interpretation” of the safety data was that “most reported adverse events were mild and short in duration”. This message was amplified, if not trumpeted, by the MSM around the world.
Hence the questions: is that professional negligence by the CDC, is that regulatory capture of the FDA, is that a safe effective vaccine? (Answers on a postcard.)
It is OK to have some questions that don't have answers yet,
but answers that cannot be questioned where is the science in that?
Software of life - their analogy -
What about programming errors, hurtin' you and me?
Plug and play with your RNA,
Do they know what it does to your DNA?
Did the FDA or the CDC even ask those questions on behalf of me?
All of the vaccines use synthetic gene technology.
But genotoxicity studies were not required by the FDA.
So they don't know if it does damage to your DNA.
Again, I’ll refer to an article by Jessica Rose who explains that:
Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity studies were NOT done because... the WHO
It is a reasonable question to ask: Why (were the studies not done)?
Here’s their answer:
Because the genetic material and the fats were not expected to have genotoxic, carcinogenic or tumorigenic potential.
Oh ok, and cigarettes were not expected to promote lung cancer and thalidomide was not expected to deform babies and the rotavirus vaccine was not expected to cause intussusception and combined MMR vaccine was not expected to cause autism if given to babies before 18 months of life. Should I go on? Besides, the World Health Organization (WHO) establishment assures us (in 2005 - wasn’t that 17 years ago?) that “Carcinogenicity testing is generally not considered necessary to support the development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO, 2005).”
Mommy, Daddy, what's gonna happen to me?
What's gonna happen to me?
What's gonna happen?
What's gonna happen to me?
What's gonna happen?
So, no-one knows what’s going to happen to you (over the mid- to long-term) if you take these injectable products. For short term effects, refer to VAERS and that paper written by the CDC COVID-19 Response Team: 1 in 12 reports are serious; 1 in 70 reports are deaths. Safe and effective?