Quit You Cheater

Single released on 3 September 2022

(For more information on this substack and the band - Not Fit For Purpose - the What/Why/Who/When/Where/How - check out my about page. To listen to the track on Bandcamp, click on the album artwork.)

I couldn’t believe it when I read in June that the COVID-19 injectable products were being authorised for children under five. Digging into the data, it became clear that it was cherry picked in order to get the “right” efficacy result (never mind the safety issues). The lyrics pick out the key numbers: 375 children got the “proxy” for COVID infection, but there were too many of them in the “vaccine” arm. So 365 children were ignored, and it was whittled down to just 10 children to come up with the “right” efficacy result. Add to that the fact that two thirds of the trial participants didn’t finish the trial, and the only question to ask is “Why?”. Presumably no-one bothered to follow-up? Or maybe they didn’t want to know, because it would have to be reported in the clinical trial documents?

The album art shows the numbers of children getting each dose in the trial, and then how many got the "proxy" for COVID infection, and how many dropped out, or moved on to the next dose.

But, first let’s set the scene - Naomi Wolf published on May 30 an article with the sub-title: “It’s Really True: They Know they are Killing the Babies”. This discusses how Pfizer and the FDA knew that the mRNA “vaccines” did not work, that they knew in May of 2021 “35 minors’ hearts had been damaged a week after MRNA injection - but the FDA rolled out the EUA for teens a month later anyway”, that the spike protein and lipid nanoparticles did not stay in the injection site but went into the blood stream and onto major organs, etc. etc. So, they knew about the issues and carried on with the EUA.

Now we get to the under 5s…

Here’s the announcement from the CDC on June 18, and (if you can bear to watch it) a director debrief video with CDC director Rochelle Walensky claiming a “rigorous scientific review” that concluded the vaccines are “safe and effective” for under 5s.

• Quit you cheater, say it's not fraud,
  Emergency use authorisation.
  Why did most of the data get ignored
  In your "rigorous" evaluation?
  Yet every data point is a child,
  A living, breathing, precious human being.
  So you sacrificed each child
  With your data manipulation.

Here’s the FDA briefing document for the meeting on June 15 to assess the EUA request for the Pfizer vaccine for under 5s.

• Quit you cheater, where is the truth
  Buried deep in your documentation?
  Those figures for efficacy
  Are a complete fabrication.
  Three hundred and seventy five children
  With a proxy for covid infection,
  And you ignored ninety seven percent
  Of those poor children.

Yes, it is a long document. Alex Berenson highlights the key numbers for the efficacy result, picking out a couple of key tables, and leading with: “That 80 percent figure for efficacy you’ve seen reported is worse than a joke, it’s essentially a fabrication.”

• Quit you cheater, how can you claim
  Your injectable product is working
  When you compare only ten children
  Out of four thousand five hundred and twenty six,
  Two thirds of whom didn’t finish the trial?

And the HART group calls the FDA outcome an “unfathomable decision given the trial data”, in particular highlighting the huge number (3000) of participants who didn’t make it to the end of the trial.

That alone is enough to make the findings null and void.

• Quit you cheater, what happened to those
  Three thousand children, why didn’t they finish?
  Maybe seizures or nervous system disorders,
  Or life threatening illnesses, or did they die?
  Quit you cheater, tell us the truth.
  You are the arbiter of the clinical trial.
  FDA, CDC, did you ask what’s in the placebo vial?

Later in the HART group report, they note:

Safety was only monitored for 6 weeks before they decided to vaccinate the children in the placebo group showing a total disregard for a meaningful collection of true safety data.

• Quit you cheater, there’s no covid risk
  To under fives, so no need for
  Emergency use authorisation.
  There is no safety control group,
  So no-one knows the risk
  Of the clot shot jabs to our poor children.
  Your trial data demonstrate there’s no benefit
  Only risk to our children.

Finally, I’d like to draw your attention to Jessica Rose’s article (ON placebos: either way, it's evidence of negligent harm) about placebos and adverse events, including in the trials for under 5s.

I have never been comfortable with the use of the word “placebo” (as most of you are aware) in the context of the COVID-19 injectable products and have postulated that the “placebo” groups were in fact being administered empty LNPs and not saline, due to the rates of severe adverse events in the context of “placebo”.

• They demonstrate an unknown risk,
  So will you quit you cheater,
  Quit you cheater - negligence?
  Quit you cheater, is this negligence?
  Quit you cheater, is this negligent harm?

Answers on a postcard.